Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Not a bad idea, although I’m not sure how the UI would work.

    I’ve been thinking the next major release should add runner numbers (either entered or auto-generated) which would then let you say release 10 at a time.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Maybe the easiest way to do this is based on the order they are initially listed and then choosing the group sizes. So if there are 30 participants with group sizes of 5 then start the 1st 5 listed, then the second 5 for a total of 6 groups. It would be either that or we would have to manually define the groups. What would be even better is if we had the choice to manually start the groups instead of having the app do it at a preset interval. Like a "start next group" button at the top.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base